Large Firm Service. Small Firm Attention.
Guardianship: Fact vs. Fiction
Published April 21, 2021
In recent months, television viewers have been captivated by docuseries and fictional portrayals of conservatorship, known in New York as Guardianship. As with most on-screen productions, there may be more dramatic fiction at work than factual portrayal. A reasonable viewer would be worried about the prospect of guardianship, and maybe with good reason. A guardianship proceeding is an involved and often expensive process whereby a court declares a party to be incapacitated. This often means that the party no longer makes decisions about finances or medical treatment or even where they reside. It is essential to understand the New York State statutory framework and what our clients can do to avoid a guardianship altogether.
In this blog we will separate fact from fiction.
Fiction: Guardianship proceedings happen without the participation of the person alleged to be incapacitated.
Fact: Guardianship proceedings in New York are initiated through the New York State Supreme Court and constitutional protections exist in each proceeding which afford the person alleged to be incapacitated with right to be heard at any hearing which relates to their case. In fact, if the alleged incapacitated person (“AIP”) is not present at the hearing, and no adequate reason is provided for their absence, any decision subsequently made by a judge can be overturned by a higher court. In New York, guardianships are initiated pursuant to the Mental Hygiene Law which is a statute with a multitude of protections for the AIP. Moreover, if the presiding judge does not appoint an attorney for the AIP, the AIP always maintains the right to request an attorney be appointed at any time during the guardianship proceeding.
Fiction: Family members are not notified of a pending guardianship proceeding and therefore a stranger can be appointed as guardian of the alleged incapacitated person without the input of close family or friends.
Fact: Article 81 gives very specific written direction of who must be noticed of a pending guardianship hearing. Failure to notify all appropriate parties could invalidate any later guardianship findings. Among a variety of parties, the statute requires that the spouse, adult children, siblings, and parties who are active participants in the life of the IP receive notice of any pending proceeding. Upon the initiation of the case the Court will direct service of relevant documents upon all named relatives and will make further inquiry throughout the process to assure that all relevant parties are apprised of the status of the guardianship proceeding. Moreover, interested family members can themselves petition for guardianship if they oppose the application being brought before the Court.
Fiction: Bank accounts or financial resources of the person alleged to be incapacitated can be accessed at whim by a court appointed guardian.
Fact: Guardianships matters are given great attention by the court and continuous oversight even after the initial proceeding has concluded. Pursuant to the Metal Hygiene Law, any guardian appointed over financial assets of an incapacitated person (“IP”) must provide several different reports to the court for review. First, 90 days after appointment, a court appointed guardian must submit an Initial Report for review. This report will detail what assets the IP owns and where such assets are held. Thereafter, at the end of each calendar year the guardian must provide the court with a comprehensive document known as an annual accounting. This accounting is a very detailed report of each expenditure made on behalf of the IP (with accompanying receipts for each transaction) as well as a detailed report of all investment gains and losses. These reports must be provided each year until the death of the IP. These reports are reviewed in detail by a court appointed examiner who has the authority to report back to the court if their investigation reveals any financial irregularities or concerns.
Furthermore, guardians in New York must seek permission of the court to sell real property belonging to the IP, which assures an additional layer of protection for the IP. The guardian must present a compelling reason to sell real estate, especially if the IP is residing in the home at the time the sale is proposed.
Fiction: A guardian can send an Incapacitated Person to live in a nursing home against their will or without just reason.
Fact: A further proceeding under MHL Article 81 will be held to determine whether an incapacitated party should be moved into a nursing facility or other congregate care setting. If a court determines that a person is incapacitated within the meaning of the Metal Hygiene Law, the court may appoint a personal needs guardian. This type of guardian is commonly tasked with managing the care needs of the IP to assure that they are accessing and receiving the best quality of care available. Care can be delivered in a variety of settings, including at the home of the IP, in an assisted living or at a nursing home. Decisions regarding the day-to-day care of the IP are within the authority held by the guardian. If a guardian seeks to transfer the IP to a new care setting, he or she must first make an application to the court for permission to do so. This application must contain information pertaining to the proposed move, including the identify of the proposed care setting, the services available therein and the just cause for changing the residence of the IP. The IP would be noticed of such proceeding and permitted to participate and be present during any discussion around a change in care. If the IP objects to the proposal, he or she can request counsel for the purposes of filing written objections to the proposed plan. In any case, decisions pertaining to change in home environment are not taken lightly and will be subjected to great scrutiny by the guardianship judge.
Fiction: Clients are at risk of having this proceeding initiated at any time and there is nothing they can do to protect themselves from a guardianship proceeding.
Fact: Clients who are proactive in their estate planning can avoid lengthy guardianship proceedings and can protect themselves from unwanted intervention. At Littman Krooks we understand the importance of a properly prepared estate plan. Since we handle a high volume of guardianship matters, we are uniquely equipped to understand how best to create an estate plan to avoid unwanted guardianship proceedings. Our experienced attorneys will individualize a plan for each client and access all available estate planning documents which would eliminate the need for guardianship all together. If a client has a properly executed Power of Attorney and Health Care Proxy, commonly referred to as Advance Directives, they can likely defeat an application for guardianship. Under the Mental Hygiene Law a proposed guardian must demonstrate that the advanced directives are inadequate means to care for the incapacitated person before a guardianship will be considered. Contact us with questions at 914-684-2100 or click here.
Corporate & Securities
Elder Law & Estate Planning
Special Needs Planning
Special Education Advocacy